management
Vahid Mohammadi; Musa Rezvani Chaman Zamin; Badri Abbasi; Morteza Hazraty; Mehran Nasirzad
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to provide a model of the quality of work life with a strategic approach of human resources in the administrative system of Bank Mellat. According to its purpose, the research method is applied, mixed (qualitative-quantitative) in terms of implementation, and descriptive-survey ...
Read More
The purpose of this research is to provide a model of the quality of work life with a strategic approach of human resources in the administrative system of Bank Mellat. According to its purpose, the research method is applied, mixed (qualitative-quantitative) in terms of implementation, and descriptive-survey in terms of nature and method. The statistical population included 20 academic and banking experts in the qualitative section and 378 employees and experts of Mellat Bank across the country were selected as a sample in the quantitative section, and simple stratified sampling was used. Data collection was done in the qualitative part of semi-structured interviews and in the quantitative part of the questionnaire. MAXQDA coding and software were used in qualitative part data analysis and SPSS and AMOS software were used in quantitative part. The results of the t-test showed that all 5 main components, 20 sub-components and 118 sub-components identified have an impact on the quality of work life with the strategic approach of human resources in the administrative system of Bank Mellat. The results obtained from the model fit indices also showed that the research model is a good model in terms of fit with the experimental data. The results of the t test showed that the most effective component on the pattern of quality of work life with a strategic approach to human resources in the administrative system of Bank Mellat is the component "Working relationships between colleagues" with a statistical value (t = 31.045) and the least effective component is also The component "decision support systems in managers' decision-making" with a statistical value (t = 13.102) is in this evaluation.
